Subject	and your ignoring double standards (n/m)
Posted by	Dane (Houston) on October 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 151 times.
In Reply To	Stop ignoring the facts. posted by rojoloco (VA Beach) on October 21, 2012 at 07:13 PM
Message
Follow Ups	*sigh* Add another duped product to the list... - Mike TDK (NoVA) 09:59:47 10/21/12 Regular price 468 - SimaYi 10:07:18 10/21/12 yes but no, this was originally a Carbing product. - Dane (Houston) 13:33:03 10/21/12 I get the ams hate, but this doesn't really fit. - Antihero 20:56:31 10/21/12 Yep, I know Carbing was the first one. - SimaYi 21:26:21 10/21/12 Nobody can copywrite/patent their work or what? (n/m) - Supermario680 (WI) 10:25:50 10/21/12 the logical guess is that the number of units that can - LJZTT 10:56:09 10/21/12 THIS^^^^^^is the correct answer (n/m) - TTZEDHEAD 11:13:18 10/21/12 It's not cost effective... Even if the innovators for our - 300zxttZMan 14:22:27 10/21/12 vuk is seriously a crackpot..blame canadia! (n/m) - genic 11:22:17 10/21/12 Don't drag us into it... We support the good guys. (n/m) - vorpalZ 13:09:10 10/21/12 genic is still catching up, he should get a green N :) (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 20:14:43 10/21/12 you need a pole in the ass (n/m) - genic 20:24:12 10/21/12 There are good Canadians and bad Canadians - BigTDogg (MA) 21:06:02 10/21/12 ok but what about... - 300twinz (satx) 12:30:52 10/21/12 troof! (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 13:09:37 10/21/12 Re: ok but what about... - RobZ32 13:22:00 10/21/12 Its still a coppy, alot of ams's products are copys of copys - DualZ (SF) 14:20:57 10/21/12 just cause PT made the rear bar cheaper (non elliptical) - Dane (Houston) 15:00:33 10/21/12 False. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 15:13:59 10/21/12 "the rear bar, they are just totally different in every way" - Z1 ZONLY 15:30:21 10/21/12 rest my case.... (n/m) - Dane (Houston) 16:00:57 10/21/12 Look again. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 16:51:19 10/21/12 LOL. Nice Scientific and Real world testing data. (n/m) - 300twinz (satx) 17:50:45 10/21/12 he's vewwy smrt (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 18:40:40 10/21/12 That was already accomplished in the R&D portion of it. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 19:14:49 10/21/12 oh you mean jumping on it in a parking lot? - 300twinz (satx) 19:48:41 10/21/12 Don't be ignorant. You're better than that. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:27:24 10/22/12 Just stating facts - 300twinz (satx) 16:05:45 10/22/12 Out of context. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 20:06:41 10/22/12 Research & Development? I think you mean Buy & Copy. (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 08:03:42 10/22/12 False. I've actually been present for some of it. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:37:46 10/22/12 They are very similar, but there are design differences - Lumpydonut 18:58:07 10/21/12 Well... - Bernie (NoVA) 22:00:40 10/21/12 All inferior in design if... - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:29:29 10/22/12 you must of missed this - Dane (Houston) 23:56:04 10/21/12 Charles says exactly why the holes are there. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 20:19:12 10/22/12 Oh okay so i can make the same part with square bars and - Dane (Houston) 18:58:43 10/21/12 Stop ignoring the facts. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 19:13:30 10/21/12 and your ignoring double standards (n/m) - Dane (Houston) 23:57:01 10/21/12 he's a patsy (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 08:04:54 10/22/12 Actually, I'm not. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:33:53 10/22/12 sorry i call it how it is... (n/m) - Dane (Houston) 16:08:14 10/21/12 2nd... the Powertrix one is not a carbon copy. (n/m) - Piranha 16:30:06 10/21/12 +1 Not to mention Kaminari "Replicas" - Z_Pilot 15:14:42 10/21/12 Nobody cared to argue against this LOL (n/m) - gnozahs 13:17:11 10/22/12 I've been saying this since they came out (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 18:39:25 10/21/12 It is one thing to take a(1) design and change/make better - z-u-later 20:46:10 10/21/12 what about eagle vs pauter vs .........? (n/m) - LJZTT 21:22:49 10/21/12 as you're aware... - aliaZ 07:34:20 10/22/12 I know - LJZTT 10:27:17 10/23/12 agreed (n/m) - aliaZ 10:21:23 10/24/12 In all honestly i really dont really think that either - jmt-z 21:37:21 10/21/12 there are lots of improper ways to do it - Adam (NoVA) 08:06:29 10/22/12 Please explain how Powertrix carbon copied it. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:40:54 10/22/12 IMHO, the Powertrix parts are not an exact copy - BigTDogg (MA) 10:22:25 10/22/12 Here are some of the differences... - rojoloco (VA Beach) 12:50:27 10/22/12 But the front bar? Let's be realistic... (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 15:15:08 10/22/12 Similarities but not the same. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 20:10:31 10/22/12 I don't like how you are defending this . - ArubaDave 23:55:48 10/22/12 Agreed (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 10:17:55 10/23/12 It's not so much a defense as much as it is irritation. - rojoloco (VA Beach) 11:30:58 10/23/12 *sigh* What a load of bull shit filled clowns... (n/m) - AsaHerring 13:03:44 10/21/12 Re: *sigh* Add another duped product to the list... - Gixxer 13:22:25 10/21/12 Wow. -.- (n/m) - 300zxttZMan 14:07:30 10/21/12 You can help, and it won't cost you a penny - BigTDogg (MA) 19:55:02 10/21/12 signed. (n/m) - Drk93TT 20:43:36 10/21/12 signed! (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 22:54:28 10/21/12 Re: You can help, and it won't cost you a penny - Dallas DamonZ 00:53:23 10/22/12 Yup, I'm missing too (n/m) - Aqualung 08:25:53 10/22/12 You guys are on this one: - BigTDogg (MA) 09:20:40 10/22/12 wow.... :( Well the kids on 3ZC will be happy (n/m) - Zski 08:06:28 10/22/12 that's sad to hear - gnozahs 13:16:05 10/22/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.